Yea I didn't think about the disturbed album title and if I read about it,I obiviously blocked it out of my mind,thus,I am totally convinced that this title is a decoy.

There I said it!

10th_millennium?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/10th_millennium
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Year_10%2C000_problem

1 year * 10,000 = ?!

oh fuck all this shit.. oO

I really don't even think you're actually reading my posts. I haven't called you a single name other than a condescending fool...which is absolutely true. I'm not calling you idiot, moron, whatever...I'm just saying your tone is not at all warranted.

And you're still not even listening to what I'm saying--releasing a fake album title does NOT prevent leaks when people have such high doubts that the title is even real. Do you get this? It's really very simple. But every time I say it it's almost like you don't even read it.

I'm not saying the album title isn't fake. I'm ONLY saying the people citing all the reasons why it's certainly, definitely fake are using very poor evidence to support their claims.

Does this mean my Toshiba laptop might stop working in the year 10,000?

God, I hate Wikipedia.

smart answer.
good for you.
In fact, I don´t give a shit about the fckn name of the new album and about what U think.. Just wait... shut up and wait.

i found this when i was messing around, looking for 10000 days on google. It's a quote by a Dr. Wayne Dyer:
"Have you really lived 10,000 or more days,
or have you lived one day 10,000 or more times?"

not sure what this could have to do with the title, but I thought it was interesting

http://toolnavy.com/showthread.php?t=37256

If you're referring to the Andy King review, that was posted in mid-February in which case, at the time of that particular listening they perhaps were not offering an album title (nor did they offer any track listings as well).

The title "10,000 Days" was not revealed until Blair's mentioning of it at the beginning of March so the point is arguement really has no relevence.

Sometimes dates and times mean everything when quibbling over possible facts. In this case, it could easily be fact that no title was given at that particular moment in Australia meaning his comment about it not being named yet would still be perfectly valid while the "fact" that the disc is now to be named 10,000 Days could still be absolutely true as well.

Did I mention yet that none of this arguing of points and suspicions even matters anyways? When the disc comes out, everyone will know what it is and none of this wasted energy will be able to be re-gained. I myself am missing out on some valuable masterbation time by even responding to this post. Nonetheless, you seem like a well-intentioned person so I felt maybe you would welcome this opinion.

I agree with this last part...dates and times mean everything....names and origin mean nothing, huh? ie- Andy King isnt from Australia.

Your point has no relevence.

You forgot the word "sometimes" which implies that dates and times are not of exclusive importance. Would be nice to have been quoted more accurately in that regard then as I personally in no way believe names and origin mean nothing, nor did my comment imply such. That's a conclusion you've apparently drawn (falsely I might add), and only by first dropping a key word from my sentence so that it fits your line of thinking.

For the record, you are right regarding Andy King. He is not from Australia. I will absolutely conceed that, and I'm surprised you did not quote that moment to begin with where I basically assumed he was. But you will notice my entire post was based on the idea that tcM_Emprorer's comments may have been in reference to Andy King in which case, the point is still valid whether he was in Australia, the UK, or the local Outback Steakhouse. IF he was referring to the King review (and currently I believe he was), that review was posted in mid-February when an album title may or may not have been offered and/or decided upon. It is the only review thus far that I'm aware of which refers to the album as not yet being titled.

The only current report I've seen discussed which DOES stem from Australia is the TripleJ radio comments where he does indeed mention the album title as being 10,000 Days, so in that sense as well, tcM's comments appear to be somewhat jumbled. If there is an additional Australian account claiming that the album title has NOT been set, at best it would be in contradiction to the TripleJ information stating otherwise. Since the TripleJ information has come out, I know of no other review (from Australia or otherwise) that is still suggesting the album has not yet been titled.

I guess from my perspective, it falls back on tcM_Emporer and what he was or wasn't referring to. So, to tcM_Emporer: could you please elaborate on your thoughts and, if you were not referring to the Andy King review then what information where you referring to instead that also claims a title has not yet been decided.

Thank in advance, tcM :)

Who cares if it's real or not?

Tool needs to release this fucking album NOW, or we're all gonna kill each other arguing about the title and they'll sell no records.

Funny how this argument seems so familiar . . . http://www.toolnavy.com/showthread.p...oto=nextnewest

Anyways, I can settle this all for you right now.

You see, my brothers and sisters, the lord Maynard himself came down upon me, he did, and told me the name of the new album. In His rightousness, and in His glory, He has spoken to me the words that shall soon be gracing the CD Jackets which all of you shall possess, more numerous than the bible, the Holy Scripture of the Church of the Tool.

He Himself came to me in this vision, and he moved in close upon the wings of an angel, naked in all His glory, and whispered into my ear the title and wisdom of the next holy book of Tool, which was "AutoFellatio". This seems to be a return to the golden days of Tool, were sucking on your own dick (a la AEnima's magic cover) was the accepted norm.


Anyways, I think we should argue more about whether the title is this or the title is that, because in the grand scheme of thing its incredably important. I mean, while it has no bearing on the actual outcome, and the answer is going to be known soon enough, and the songs are going to be great regardless, this is important to argue about now, because, um, shit, I forgot where I was going with this.

In my mind the only real info about the new album is the release date.

At least, I hope that part is true.

Im with Rarefuel on this.

Im only worried about the release date. Im taking every other bit of info about the album cautiously, i mean Tool have been known to fool us on a lot of occasions.

um yah.

i agree...its sad because ive waited so long and i want some real info but its just to tough to tell.

We don't care about the fucking titles, what we care about is the music we're gonna listen to, and I think it'll be TOOL's best album. Why do we care about fucking titles anyway... they must be laughing knowing that people like us are caring so much about the titles of the album, they must think their fans are fucking retarded... and yes, we're all retarded.

Hear, hear!

kudos to you! yes! yes! we are retarded! i am so glad someone else sees this! :)

Maynard wouldn't be that obvious. In first place, the title sounds anything but Tool-ish, u don't go from Aenima and Lateralus to something as mind-numbingly mundane as "10,000 Days'. Like others have said, Maynard's most likely doing this to provoke anticipation for the new album.

your name is really stupid. i bet that's your email too isn't it?

Knowing how awesome the artwork was for the last album, I'm really excited to see what they'll come up with for the new one, their artwork has always been more innovative than alot of other bands

yeah, and your point is?

do you and maynard, like, talk on the weekend or something?

What in Tool's history, besides their music, hasn't proved them lame....

seriously?