Interesting, If my computer wasn't so old and slow then I could probably see the other half of it, (but it's ok I love my Vash yes I named my computer....) Anyways, what type of techniques are you using? -The Kateness
__________________ "mention this to me, mention something mention anything and watch the weather change..."- "Disposition"
Yes, my image works perfectly. The circles going in a spiral look awesome. I have no idea why it doesn't work for you. Try sitting farther away from it.
The circles kind of work, but the best parts I see are the pole and the bent-line thingie. Those look good, I think the rest might look a tad odd just cuz of the colors maybe? I dunno. It works though, just some parts stick out more.
Ok, I saw it, but I had to use the glasses from the package, and zoom the image to less than 50% it's original size. Are you supposed to see it without the glasses? If so, how?
worked great for me. but i've been looking at alot of stereoscopic images this past week, especially the ones on adam's myspace. very good job. feel free to post any other ones you make, i really like these.
I left my tool album in the car, so i (feeling stupid) tried to make it work without the glasses... and wow if you squint, so that the two images become one (you will see 3 versions of the image), the combined image in the middle is in 3d. Although it is blurry because your squinting...
I have no trouble seeing the pictures but then again I'm really into stereoscopy . Any way, I'd say the picture is a bit too intense, it would be a bit easier on the eye's if the interocular distance was lessened a bit.
Hey MT, just seen this thread + to be honest i think yours work better than any of the photographic ones. The Grand Canyon had such scope but you just get a random bloke on a rock in the foreground, mebbe sumthin in the middleground (i forget, im pissed + its late) and then the canyon in the back. It looked to me like separate photos arranged at different distances, each one entirely flat. The graded shading on your numbered circles really helps them leap out of the screen, and you can let your eyes wander down the blue line as it projects towards you. Similar with the cone, although i do agree that it should perhaps be a little more subtle. Its all about tricking the mind, and i reckon doing that with photographs would involve some serious messing about in photoshop or whatever, you'd have to really enhance the interocular distance at the legs of the bloke in comparison with the head and arm. The most effective of Tool's SSIs (the fiery serpent or the semitranslucent figurent with the spiralling grey spheres + bars) work so well cuz they're abstractions of instantly recognisable images with simpler, although very well rendered, shapes reaching in and out of the page. When the effect works well it can be surprisingly (or maybe not) similar to psychedelics: i once saw (on the only occasion i've managed to get hold of powerful acid D:) a double-helical golden spiral rising up out of the floor that held its structural integrity as i moved around it
Last edited by IxCheltab; 09-27-2006 at 07:19 PM..
MAN!
I saw how you guys where fighting about how does a stereoscopic image work.
i mean...a stereoscopic image is a image that has two diferent pictures from two diferent
angles that should be viewed by those glaces that make your eyes look at pictuers at the same time(right eye on the right picture,left eye on the left picture).so...when you look at them they are 3-d.