Adam's myspace and the band's recent interviews would have you believe the recording sessions started in August.
Posted in the February 2005 newsletter..
"Yes, we know that the silver Coleman keeps ice for three days, but what about the new CD?" "Okay, the recording sessions are going very well, although it's still too early in the process for there to be a specific release date. Ditto with the live DVD, which isn't finished being edited yet, and which probably won't be released until after the new CD, perhaps in tandem with some other goodies that have been in the works for a while. Did you see Pinocchio's Daring Journey next door? Well, the band has its own Mr. Stromboli to deal with these days. Whoa!, that water stain in the boiler room looks like... the head of John the Baptist! Imagineering at its finest, don't you guys think?"
04-27-2006, 01:19 AM
|
#1
|
Level 1 - Lurker
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: roro
|
A Glaring Inconsistency..
Adam's myspace and the band's recent interviews would have you believe the recording sessions started in August.
Posted in the February 2005 newsletter..
"Yes, we know that the silver Coleman keeps ice for three days, but what about the new CD?" "Okay, the recording sessions are going very well, although it's still too early in the process for there to be a specific release date. Ditto with the live DVD, which isn't finished being edited yet, and which probably won't be released until after the new CD, perhaps in tandem with some other goodies that have been in the works for a while. Did you see Pinocchio's Daring Journey next door? Well, the band has its own Mr. Stromboli to deal with these days. Whoa!, that water stain in the boiler room looks like... the head of John the Baptist! Imagineering at its finest, don't you guys think?"
|
OFFLINE |
|
|
04-27-2006, 02:59 AM
The reference to Pinnochhio in there tells me that something within that paragraph is not truthfull.
I struggle to understand your point though. Care to explain?
__________________
"10, 000 Days was everything I wanted Lateralus to be. When I first got it [Lateralus] I felt it was a very very good album but no way up there with my favourites. Then 10, 000 Days came and it was like 'woah'."
04-27-2006, 02:59 AM
|
#2
|
Level 7 - Loquacious
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Southern England (The best bit)
Posts: 344
Bincount™: 192
|
Re: A Glaring Inconsistency..
The reference to Pinnochhio in there tells me that something within that paragraph is not truthfull.
I struggle to understand your point though. Care to explain?
__________________
"10, 000 Days was everything I wanted Lateralus to be. When I first got it [Lateralus] I felt it was a very very good album but no way up there with my favourites. Then 10, 000 Days came and it was like 'woah'."
|
OFFLINE |
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cucumber_11
The reference to Pinnochhio in there tells me that something within that paragraph is not truthfull.
I struggle to understand your point though. Care to explain?
|
This isn't consistent with what the band has been saying in interviews. They were recording over a year ago when you would think they would've still been writing.
I don't know, I'm not putting much into it, just an interesting observation I thought.
Last edited by sasukefutant; 04-27-2006 at 03:13 AM..
04-27-2006, 03:08 AM
|
#3
|
Level 1 - Lurker
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: roro
|
Re: A Glaring Inconsistency..
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cucumber_11
The reference to Pinnochhio in there tells me that something within that paragraph is not truthfull.
I struggle to understand your point though. Care to explain?
|
This isn't consistent with what the band has been saying in interviews. They were recording over a year ago when you would think they would've still been writing.
I don't know, I'm not putting much into it, just an interesting observation I thought.
Last edited by sasukefutant; 04-27-2006 at 03:13 AM..
|
OFFLINE |
|
|
"perhaps in tandem with some other goodies that have been in the works for a while"
All I know is that sounds interesting as hell by itself. Other than the album and live DVD what else is there?
04-27-2006, 03:24 AM
|
#4
|
On Probation
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Athens, Ga
|
Re: A Glaring Inconsistency..
"perhaps in tandem with some other goodies that have been in the works for a while"
All I know is that sounds interesting as hell by itself. Other than the album and live DVD what else is there?
|
OFFLINE |
|
|
04-27-2006, 03:57 AM
Maybe the real b-sides from Lateralus will be included with the Live DVD???
__________________
Brain: an apparatus with which we think we think. -Ambrose Bierce
04-27-2006, 03:57 AM
|
#5
|
Level 7 - Loquacious
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: UK
|
Re: A Glaring Inconsistency..
Maybe the real b-sides from Lateralus will be included with the Live DVD???
__________________
Brain: an apparatus with which we think we think. -Ambrose Bierce
|
OFFLINE |
|
|
04-27-2006, 04:56 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by WilliamGraves
"perhaps in tandem with some other goodies that have been in the works for a while"
All I know is that sounds interesting as hell by itself. Other than the album and live DVD what else is there?
|
I think it was a reference to the DVD singles, this newsletter is over a year old.
__________________
"10, 000 Days was everything I wanted Lateralus to be. When I first got it [Lateralus] I felt it was a very very good album but no way up there with my favourites. Then 10, 000 Days came and it was like 'woah'."
04-27-2006, 04:56 AM
|
#6
|
Level 7 - Loquacious
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Southern England (The best bit)
Posts: 344
Bincount™: 192
|
Re: A Glaring Inconsistency..
Quote:
Originally Posted by WilliamGraves
"perhaps in tandem with some other goodies that have been in the works for a while"
All I know is that sounds interesting as hell by itself. Other than the album and live DVD what else is there?
|
I think it was a reference to the DVD singles, this newsletter is over a year old.
__________________
"10, 000 Days was everything I wanted Lateralus to be. When I first got it [Lateralus] I felt it was a very very good album but no way up there with my favourites. Then 10, 000 Days came and it was like 'woah'."
|
OFFLINE |
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cucumber_11
I think it was a reference to the DVD singles, this newsletter is over a year old.
|
Yeah, but nonetheless this means they had to have been laying tracks down over a year ago. What happened to these sessions? They claim that they had written the entire album besides Right In Two before they entered the studio(which we're lead to believe was in early August). Check out the answer the OUIJA board gave to a question regarding Rosetta Stoned. Specifically, "Yes and No." The albums out and I still don't understand that answer. Perhaps someone could enlighten me?
It isn't unreasonable to use the OUIJA boards answer to that question and the fact that they, indeed, were in the studio prior to August to suggest that, perhaps, 10,000 Days was recorded months ago and the sessions that took place in August were for another album. I really fucking doubt that, but..."No, when I left Bay 7's studio B on that chilly January night, Salma was still dancing, although she was now doing so for someone else (the Devo dolls?)." Further mixing sessions?
This along with a few cryptic "hints"(Miss July as a literary device, the whole key and locking the door thing, even some of his Pinnochio ramblings could be interpreted to relate to Tool) Blair has given us through newsletters will not allow the thought of another release to leave my mind.
I really don't believe another Tool release is anything close to imminent, but I wish I could let the distant thought of its possibility leave my mind as 10,000 Days definitely has left me hungry for more.
I really fucking doubt it.
04-27-2006, 06:55 AM
|
#7
|
Level 1 - Lurker
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: roro
|
Re: A Glaring Inconsistency..
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cucumber_11
I think it was a reference to the DVD singles, this newsletter is over a year old.
|
Yeah, but nonetheless this means they had to have been laying tracks down over a year ago. What happened to these sessions? They claim that they had written the entire album besides Right In Two before they entered the studio(which we're lead to believe was in early August). Check out the answer the OUIJA board gave to a question regarding Rosetta Stoned. Specifically, "Yes and No." The albums out and I still don't understand that answer. Perhaps someone could enlighten me?
It isn't unreasonable to use the OUIJA boards answer to that question and the fact that they, indeed, were in the studio prior to August to suggest that, perhaps, 10,000 Days was recorded months ago and the sessions that took place in August were for another album. I really fucking doubt that, but..."No, when I left Bay 7's studio B on that chilly January night, Salma was still dancing, although she was now doing so for someone else (the Devo dolls?)." Further mixing sessions?
This along with a few cryptic "hints"(Miss July as a literary device, the whole key and locking the door thing, even some of his Pinnochio ramblings could be interpreted to relate to Tool) Blair has given us through newsletters will not allow the thought of another release to leave my mind.
I really don't believe another Tool release is anything close to imminent, but I wish I could let the distant thought of its possibility leave my mind as 10,000 Days definitely has left me hungry for more.
I really fucking doubt it.
|
OFFLINE |
|
|
04-27-2006, 07:53 AM
You raise some good points. In an interview with MTV they said they were only in the recording studio for 5 - 6 months. So you could actually be on to something.
Everyone keeps batting around 6/6/06 so maybe something will happen then?
__________________
"10, 000 Days was everything I wanted Lateralus to be. When I first got it [Lateralus] I felt it was a very very good album but no way up there with my favourites. Then 10, 000 Days came and it was like 'woah'."
04-27-2006, 07:53 AM
|
#8
|
Level 7 - Loquacious
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Southern England (The best bit)
Posts: 344
Bincount™: 192
|
Re: A Glaring Inconsistency..
You raise some good points. In an interview with MTV they said they were only in the recording studio for 5 - 6 months. So you could actually be on to something.
Everyone keeps batting around 6/6/06 so maybe something will happen then?
__________________
"10, 000 Days was everything I wanted Lateralus to be. When I first got it [Lateralus] I felt it was a very very good album but no way up there with my favourites. Then 10, 000 Days came and it was like 'woah'."
|
OFFLINE |
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sasukefutant
Yeah, but nonetheless this means they had to have been laying tracks down over a year ago. What happened to these sessions? They claim that they had written the entire album besides Right In Two before they entered the studio(which we're lead to believe was in early August). Check out the answer the OUIJA board gave to a question regarding Rosetta Stoned. Specifically, "Yes and No." The albums out and I still don't understand that answer. Perhaps someone could enlighten me?
It isn't unreasonable to use the OUIJA boards answer to that question and the fact that they, indeed, were in the studio prior to August to suggest that, perhaps, 10,000 Days was recorded months ago and the sessions that took place in August were for another album. I really fucking doubt that, but..."No, when I left Bay 7's studio B on that chilly January night, Salma was still dancing, although she was now doing so for someone else (the Devo dolls?)." Further mixing sessions?
This along with a few cryptic "hints"(Miss July as a literary device, the whole key and locking the door thing, even some of his Pinnochio ramblings could be interpreted to relate to Tool) Blair has given us through newsletters will not allow the thought of another release to leave my mind.
I really don't believe another Tool release is anything close to imminent, but I wish I could let the distant thought of its possibility leave my mind as 10,000 Days definitely has left me hungry for more.
I really fucking doubt it.
|
"recording sessions" doesnt necessarily mean they were in the studio. Considering the level of musicianship it takes to master the songs they play, it would make sense that while they were jamming and working on things, they'd also be recording on lesser equipment that they own, and listening back to what they like and dont like, etc. It's all 10,000 days. What you've heard is the CD.
04-27-2006, 10:57 AM
|
#9
|
Level 4 - Thinker
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Beverly, MA
|
Re: A Glaring Inconsistency..
Quote:
Originally Posted by sasukefutant
Yeah, but nonetheless this means they had to have been laying tracks down over a year ago. What happened to these sessions? They claim that they had written the entire album besides Right In Two before they entered the studio(which we're lead to believe was in early August). Check out the answer the OUIJA board gave to a question regarding Rosetta Stoned. Specifically, "Yes and No." The albums out and I still don't understand that answer. Perhaps someone could enlighten me?
It isn't unreasonable to use the OUIJA boards answer to that question and the fact that they, indeed, were in the studio prior to August to suggest that, perhaps, 10,000 Days was recorded months ago and the sessions that took place in August were for another album. I really fucking doubt that, but..."No, when I left Bay 7's studio B on that chilly January night, Salma was still dancing, although she was now doing so for someone else (the Devo dolls?)." Further mixing sessions?
This along with a few cryptic "hints"(Miss July as a literary device, the whole key and locking the door thing, even some of his Pinnochio ramblings could be interpreted to relate to Tool) Blair has given us through newsletters will not allow the thought of another release to leave my mind.
I really don't believe another Tool release is anything close to imminent, but I wish I could let the distant thought of its possibility leave my mind as 10,000 Days definitely has left me hungry for more.
I really fucking doubt it.
|
"recording sessions" doesnt necessarily mean they were in the studio. Considering the level of musicianship it takes to master the songs they play, it would make sense that while they were jamming and working on things, they'd also be recording on lesser equipment that they own, and listening back to what they like and dont like, etc. It's all 10,000 days. What you've heard is the CD.
|
OFFLINE |
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cemetery Shindig
"recording sessions" doesnt necessarily mean they were in the studio. Considering the level of musicianship it takes to master the songs they play, it would make sense that while they were jamming and working on things, they'd also be recording on lesser equipment that they own, and listening back to what they like and dont like, etc. It's all 10,000 days. What you've heard is the CD.
|
I highly doubt Tool would refer to their construction of songs as recording sessions- even if it did include recording using lesser equipment. Typically, this would be referred to as the process of jamming and arrangement. and Tool have labeled these sessions as such in the past. Actually, they probably use recording equipment at about every one of their jam sessions as a means to preserve the excellent sections they happen upon. It's still referred to as a jam session.
04-27-2006, 11:12 AM
|
#10
|
Level 1 - Lurker
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: roro
|
Re: A Glaring Inconsistency..
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cemetery Shindig
"recording sessions" doesnt necessarily mean they were in the studio. Considering the level of musicianship it takes to master the songs they play, it would make sense that while they were jamming and working on things, they'd also be recording on lesser equipment that they own, and listening back to what they like and dont like, etc. It's all 10,000 days. What you've heard is the CD.
|
I highly doubt Tool would refer to their construction of songs as recording sessions- even if it did include recording using lesser equipment. Typically, this would be referred to as the process of jamming and arrangement. and Tool have labeled these sessions as such in the past. Actually, they probably use recording equipment at about every one of their jam sessions as a means to preserve the excellent sections they happen upon. It's still referred to as a jam session.
|
OFFLINE |
|
|
"Did you see Pinocchio's Daring Journey next door? Well, the band has its own Mr. Stromboli to deal with these days. Whoa!, that water stain in the boiler room looks like... the head of John the Baptist! Imagineering at its finest, don't you guys think?"
I don't think this is only about the ride at Disneyland. I really wonder who Tool's Mr. Stromboli (their enemy) is. HAHAHA
04-27-2006, 12:41 PM
|
#11
|
Level 5 - Deep Thinker
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: AZ-stuck in subtle realm
|
Re: A Glaring Inconsistency..
"Did you see Pinocchio's Daring Journey next door? Well, the band has its own Mr. Stromboli to deal with these days. Whoa!, that water stain in the boiler room looks like... the head of John the Baptist! Imagineering at its finest, don't you guys think?"
I don't think this is only about the ride at Disneyland. I really wonder who Tool's Mr. Stromboli (their enemy) is. HAHAHA
|
OFFLINE |
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sasukefutant
I highly doubt Tool would refer to their construction of songs as recording sessions- even if it did include recording using lesser equipment. Typically, this would be referred to as the process of jamming and arrangement. and Tool have labeled these sessions as such in the past. Actually, they probably use recording equipment at about every one of their jam sessions as a means to preserve the excellent sections they happen upon. It's still referred to as a jam session.
|
You're arguing symantics over one of Blair's posts. If there was a microphone in the room, it COULD be called a recording session. Based on the nature of Blair's posts, that's the only thing that matters. Stop speculating and enjoy the album.
04-27-2006, 01:27 PM
|
#12
|
Level 4 - Thinker
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Beverly, MA
|
Re: A Glaring Inconsistency..
Quote:
Originally Posted by sasukefutant
I highly doubt Tool would refer to their construction of songs as recording sessions- even if it did include recording using lesser equipment. Typically, this would be referred to as the process of jamming and arrangement. and Tool have labeled these sessions as such in the past. Actually, they probably use recording equipment at about every one of their jam sessions as a means to preserve the excellent sections they happen upon. It's still referred to as a jam session.
|
You're arguing symantics over one of Blair's posts. If there was a microphone in the room, it COULD be called a recording session. Based on the nature of Blair's posts, that's the only thing that matters. Stop speculating and enjoy the album.
|
OFFLINE |
|
|
haha you guys are so CUTE
04-27-2006, 02:54 PM
|
#13
|
Level 4 - Thinker
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: chicago
|
Re: A Glaring Inconsistency..
haha you guys are so CUTE
|
OFFLINE |
|
|
04-27-2006, 03:09 PM
|
#14
|
Level 1 - Lurker
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: CA
|
Re: A Glaring Inconsistency..
This intrigues me.
|
OFFLINE |
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cemetery Shindig
You're arguing symantics over one of Blair's posts. If there was a microphone in the room, it COULD be called a recording session. Based on the nature of Blair's posts, that's the only thing that matters. Stop speculating and enjoy the album.
|
Yeah, I suppose it COULD be called a recording session, but I still really doubt they would choose that wording if the cd was stilll in the process of being written. I could be wrong, but I really think not. and if I am, then the wording was chosen in poor judgment on Blair's behalf as a recording session typically means the band is laying down tracks in the studio for their soon to to be released cd.
I DO enjoy 10,000 Days. Great album. However, this is valid speculation.
04-27-2006, 04:21 PM
|
#15
|
Level 1 - Lurker
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: roro
|
Re: A Glaring Inconsistency..
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cemetery Shindig
You're arguing symantics over one of Blair's posts. If there was a microphone in the room, it COULD be called a recording session. Based on the nature of Blair's posts, that's the only thing that matters. Stop speculating and enjoy the album.
|
Yeah, I suppose it COULD be called a recording session, but I still really doubt they would choose that wording if the cd was stilll in the process of being written. I could be wrong, but I really think not. and if I am, then the wording was chosen in poor judgment on Blair's behalf as a recording session typically means the band is laying down tracks in the studio for their soon to to be released cd.
I DO enjoy 10,000 Days. Great album. However, this is valid speculation.
|
OFFLINE |
|
|
Powered by: vBulletin 3.8.7 Patch Level 2
Copyright ©2000 - 2007, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
all posts © their respective authors. the tool page is not responsible for any of their thoughts, brilliant or otherwise.
|