oooo, idea, idea....






ok






this is how it will go faith, you can not post again until you are a lv. 5 poster?






go fuck yourself

You're assuming that his/her "Location" answer was accurate.

The correct estimation is closer to 4 / 934,000,000

Or roughly 0.00000000428265525%

I'm a member of Tool so it's 3/933,999,999

Or roughly .00000032119914381284704905015744009653%

you dumbshits are overlooking an obvious fact that not everyone in Los Angels is a fan of tool, therefore the percentage goes up alot. With that said, you all suck.

SPRAY FART BITCHES!

So it IS a member of Tool, thanks for opening up my eyes!

apparently nothing

apparently nothing...at all..

I'll......keep......digging......

Play...that...funky...music....white boy.

So if you check out the dates that 2006 has posted
they appear to be


May 23, 1951
April 19, 1943
December 12, 2000 [salival release date]
August 29, 1966
April 17-18, 2001 [original lateralus release date]


These are the dates from the links (I didn't include the Aleister Crowley or Klaus Kinski links)


What does this mean? And does the s/n 2006 mean anything?

Okay, and also:
May 23, 1951= (5/23/1951) = (5+2+3+1+9+5+1) = 26
April 19, 1943= (4/19/1943) = (4+1+9+1+9+4+3) = 31

The Opiate EP release date was
March 10, 1992 (3+1+0+1+9+9+2) = 25

The Undertow release date was
April 6, 1993 (4+6+1+9+9+3) = 32


25 & 32 are close to 26 & 31, at least they add up to the same number.


So if we can correlate
May 23, 1951 [opiate]
April 19, 1943 [undertow]
December 12, 2000 [salival release date]
August 29, 1966
April 17-18, 2001 [original lateralus release date]


that leaves august 29, 1966. does this have anything to do with AENIMA?
or the new album

Is it possible to look up "2006" IP adress? I dunno...maybe this can clear things up.

how do we look up someones ip address

Holy fucking hell, man - I can't believe you actually figured this stuff out. That's really crazy. 2006 MUST BE A MEMBER OF TOOL!

Or else he's not a member of Tool. Either way, that's neat.


*cue the "you're reading too deep into this lol!" comment*

hehehe, i take credit for this fire.

Oooohhhh....

You're making an assumption. I made a calculation.

There's a difference.

wrong, nice try..

How am I making an assumption hmm? exactly.. you're dumb. go home.

i dont think that august 29th has to do with aenima ealing with the numbers. aenima came out oct. 1, 1996. but if you add the date of that (1+0+1+1+9+9+6) that comes out to be 27, making the obvious pattern of 25, 26, 27. but the only connection i gt from the website dates and the aenima release date was the birth dates of crowley (oct. 12, 1875) and kinski (oct. 18, 1926) which add up to 25 and 28(?) respectfully. and the only date left of august 29 falls on a tuesday in the year 2006. so if we're going to use the adding method while inferring to the users screen name, then taht means we still have a year to wait...

Have you surveyed every resident of LA to determine whether your claim that, "not everyone in Los Angels [sic] is a fan of tool [sic]," then?

I'm willing to bet that you haven't.

Take a class in formal reasoning and debate, then we can argue over who's dumb and who's not.

I dont need to survey everyone in los angels to claim 'not everyone in LA is a fan of tool', dolt. I can call up my numerous buddies who live in los angels and ask them if they like tool. I know for a fact one of them dosent, therefore the fact remains 'not everyone in los angels is a fan of tool'

You know your wrong, you just like to piss and moan go sit in the corner and cry.

My what?

laugh out lizoud

Its nice to know you've totally laid down and accepted getting boned by the man, if nitpicking grammar errors is your only retort you sir live a sad existence.

You're living a sad existence if you think I give two shits what some anonymous person online thinks about me.

By the way, this might help:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comma_splice

c'mon guys, you're both in your 20's and arguing over something on the internet. can't we all just get along?

so sad, dont you realize this is a tool forum? this isnt a college paper im writing, i dont give a two shits about spelling or grammar here, so be anal somewhere else it wont affect me.

Its funny when one can no longer hold an argument about the topic at hand, and they feel like they have to prove themselves by nitpicking about useless crap like mechanics.


oh and just to point out, because you're obviously to stuipd to understand true grammar rules, there arent any comma splices in my wring. jackass.




no this [slur deleted] is being anal.. ironic isnt it?

Considering that I helped build this forum, I'd say I'm quite aware.

I really couldn't care less about how ignorant or lazy you are toward proper usage and mechanics, but taking a few seconds to write in proper english makes your points more understandable. As it is, half of what you say is incomprehendible.

There's no argument to be had. You made an unsubstantianted claim and later substantiated it. I can handle that.

You should read the article I linked to, then.

lol

2006--that looks very much like a typical The Source post.

Ouch! Sounds painful.... Glad I don't have any either....

No

Chris Brightwell, i think i may be in love with you.