Quote:
Originally Posted by theamazingtool
To want to "discuss what vision one has had under altered states of consciousness while listening to a song" IS pretty silly, if you ask me. There is no sense in trying to desrcibe such IMAGINATIONS. These are entirely imaginative, unique and PERSONAL. THESE BELONG TO YOU, NOT OTHERS!
|
But to share them could be interesting. Is this not the entire purpose of art?
Edit: Just incase you're going to say, "but it isn't art," here's my response: is art not imaginative, unique and personal? Is this a reason for art
not to be published, or is it the very reason that it
should be published?