PDA

View Full Version : "full of it" or "full of shit"


will see you auntie
05-18-2006, 04:38 AM
does anyone else think that maybe maynard should have switched the lyrics a little where:
so full of it
eyeballs deep in muddy water
fuckin hypocrite

i think that full of shit would sound a little better, and be a little bit more toolish. anyone else think so?

Muladhara
05-18-2006, 04:42 AM
No.

5th Eye
05-18-2006, 04:48 AM
No.

will see you auntie
05-18-2006, 05:43 AM
well then, all of you mofos are full of it...i mean full of shit

WhyDontWeDoItInTheRoad
05-18-2006, 05:49 AM
Great Idea, Dude!

Pughwe
05-18-2006, 10:05 AM
No.
.

pork chops
05-18-2006, 10:30 AM
does anyone else think that maybe maynard should have switched the lyrics a little where:
so full of it
eyeballs deep in muddy water
fuckin hypocrite

i think that full of shit would sound a little better, and be a little bit more toolish. anyone else think so?



i am confused as to what exactly is toolish?

also, no

WitlessLiar
05-18-2006, 10:32 AM
No.

bruised_kiwi
05-18-2006, 10:47 AM
NO

whitewater
05-18-2006, 11:03 AM
does anyone else think that maybe maynard should have switched the lyrics a little where:
so full of it
eyeballs deep in muddy water
fuckin hypocrite

i think that full of shit would sound a little better, and be a little bit more toolish. anyone else think so?

I think it's fine how it is, and couldn't be any more toolish.

paraflux
05-18-2006, 11:05 AM
I think Maynard should have switched it up to look like this:

so pool of bricks
human appendages deep in shallow monkey grease
fockin dirty bastards

see when you use deep and shallow in the same line, it's just fucking brilliant


Just bustin your chops dude, it's all good.

durkabajung
05-18-2006, 12:25 PM
No

Sasha
05-18-2006, 12:26 PM
.oN

will see you auntie
05-18-2006, 01:18 PM
no...wait a minute, yes--i started this thread, so yes...maybe you guys are right.ok NO then, fuck it.

whitewater
05-18-2006, 01:34 PM
no...wait a minute, yes--i started this thread, so yes...maybe you guys are right.ok NO then, fuck it.

Ahhh, come on, you know better than that. Stand up for what you believe in. Think for yourself. You're a tool fan!

Muladhara
05-18-2006, 02:49 PM
no...wait a minute, yes--i started this thread, so yes...maybe you guys are right.ok NO then, fuck it.

No.

Muladhara
05-18-2006, 02:50 PM
Ahhh, come on, you know better than that. Stand up for what you believe in. Think for yourself. You're a tool fan!

Also no.

rogerdoger
05-18-2006, 02:56 PM
It's a great song as it is.

EdwardJamesKeenan
05-18-2006, 03:00 PM
does anyone else think that maybe maynard should have switched the lyrics a little where:
so full of it
eyeballs deep in muddy water
fuckin hypocrite

i think that full of shit would sound a little better, and be a little bit more toolish. anyone else think so?

i think that your post is very toolish

whitewater
05-18-2006, 03:59 PM
Also no.

My friend, I'm gonna have to disagree with you on that.

Systolic
05-18-2006, 04:42 PM
No.

abrack29
05-18-2006, 05:38 PM
Am I the only one who agrees with him? Everytime I hear that part, I was him to say "shit" so much... Great song though, one of my favorites.

jim39n
05-18-2006, 09:43 PM
while an expletive might add a little more emphesis, i think "it" just flows off the tounge better

thomas.freeman
05-19-2006, 02:19 AM
wow do you and maynard hook up and write lyrics cos that is like so insightful!

i bet he would love you

knpoole
05-19-2006, 04:13 PM
I have to say yes, just to go against the status quo.
.
.
.
.
.
just kidding
NO!

inSin
05-19-2006, 04:30 PM
No.

Bloody
05-20-2006, 11:07 AM
Yes.


I strive to be different.

drange
05-20-2006, 03:58 PM
No
EOD

Psilo
05-21-2006, 02:30 AM
No.

bitter_enigma
05-21-2006, 02:47 AM
No.

...this is the 'say no to drugs' petition, right?

TurdEye13
05-21-2006, 08:21 PM
No.

smeefsmeef
05-21-2006, 08:29 PM
yes.






Oops, I mean, no.

BlanketEffect
05-22-2006, 07:16 AM
Yeah, not to be a clone... as I've occasionally anticipated the word 'shit' there instead of 'it' - but in the end, I'm quite happy with it the way it is.

So, long and short - No.

bitter_enigma
05-23-2006, 06:20 AM
No shit.

champion
05-23-2006, 06:34 AM
No.

swampyfool
05-23-2006, 07:13 AM
Profanity for the sake of profanity doesn't tend to add anything to meaning, so . . .

NO.

Exegesis
05-23-2006, 08:07 AM
does anyone else think that maybe maynard should have switched the lyrics a little where:
so full of it
eyeballs deep in muddy water
fuckin hypocrite

i think that full of shit would sound a little better, and be a little bit more toolish. anyone else think so?

NO. I think whatever Maynard decided to sing and write down with his lyrics will work for me, and I'm not going to suggest he sing or write down something else with his artistic expression.

jlpeezworld
05-26-2006, 11:04 AM
Ganja Police?

I'm thinking it's Ganja Puhleeese (Please). In other words...Ganja made you act like that? Please...You must have been out your mind! It's showing that in order for someone to be such a hypocrite, they must be on something way more mind-altering than ganja. Proving they're no better than the ones they judge, and may in fact, be worse. opinions?

jim39n
05-30-2006, 03:56 PM
pushin this theory hard aren't we?

inSin
05-30-2006, 04:04 PM
No again.