xmdays back cover

[eonphi]

http://www.woolworths.co.uk/ww_p2/product/large_image.jhtml?product=50621667&image=IMGBC

not sure if this has been posted before...i haven't seen it yet

looks pretty cool

[5th Eye]

That looks expected. Nothing particularly exciting, I'll admit.

[s ti N Kfizt]

if someone will bash this, i..................

[mattw]

http://www.woolworths.co.uk/ww_p2/product/large_image.jhtml?product=50621667&image=IMGBC


Thanks for the link, although I can't help but feel that posting this is analogous to posting a picture of one of the hottest girls you've ever seen but the only picture you have is of the back of her head...

Good, but not exactly great...

Thanks anyway!

Interesting that there is no track-list on the back (again). I like it!

[slicknickshady]

that could easily be fake.

[Citizen Erased]

woolworth's is still a company? I find that more surprising really.

Haha, they're still kicking.

Thanks for the link! I'm gonna go down to Woolies to get my copy, it'll be cheaper than anywhere else.

[slicknickshady]

I believe everything else i have read and seen but this im not sure about. it looks like some of the names are photoshopped like volcano and zomba onto the picture.

I really like it though.

[mattw]

I don't really care what the back of an album looks like - it won't affect me too much either way...

Thanks again for the info!

Less than 2 weeks now.......

[Rubb.]

12 days.......mmmmm

[slicknickshady]

12 days? Well for AU people.

[a big stupid dumbass]

Thanks for the link, although I can't help but feel that posting this is analogous to posting a picture of one of the hottest girls you've ever seen but the only picture you have is of the back of her head...

Good, but not exactly great...

Thanks anyway!

Interesting that there is no track-list on the back (again). I like it!

I like it as well, it is very simple, and in contrast with what I've heard so far, it sets the owner of the album up for a startling wake up call.

p.s. ~great analogy

[Opiate_Mass]

that could easily be fake.
it is fake, look at the year down the bottom........... it says 2001 -.-
BIN!

[MOON]

it is fake, look at the year down the bottom........... it says 2001 -.-
BIN!

Exactly... !!!



.

[Sasha]

i like it except for the outer glow on the barcode, looks unprofessional.

[SpiralOutKeepGoing]

it is fake, look at the year down the bottom........... it says 2001 -.-
BIN!

Cause we all know this album was really released in 2001.

[dasmico]

yo, it definitly says 2006, look closer...

also, i dont think a department store would taked the time to photo shop a fake cover

[Mr C]

The barcode number matches with the one listed on our JBHiFi website over here.
Makes it a bit more plausible.

[thepatient_10k]

kinda looks photoshopped...that really easy to do. Could be real, i dont care..im buying the thing anyways

[magnolia]

the barcode looks reallllly bad. the glow effect was badly done. other than that -- half-decent photoshop.

[eonphi]

y do people keep saying this is photoshop work? i got this from woolworths.co.uk why the hell would it be fake? i haven't done it and i'm sure woolworths wouldn't bother making a fake back cover for it...I know tool is big to us but to them i'm sure they couldn't give a shit...and the "glow" effect on the bar code is exactly the same as the bar code on the schism/parabola dvd's by the way...anyway...we'll see when it's released

[Sasha]

The glow being the same doesn't make it anymore appealing. It's still shitty, fake or not.

[Squishy]

I do think it's real and I do like the glow effect. A lot actually.

[orange.juice]

This is so fake... LOL

[randomhero8823]

very fake indeed, and im pretty sure it says 2001

[5th Eye]

It definitely says 2006. You can tell because there's more glowy stuff closer to the bottom.

But really, why does what the back cover looks like matter at all?

[rimb]

It definitely says 2006. You can tell because there's more glowy stuff closer to the bottom.

It clearly doesn't.

You want to believe.

[5th Eye]

Actually I couldn't care less.

[devohkeenan]

The fact is...if someone wanted to show this off why wouldnt they just take a picture of the whole case. Its either fake or someones dumb....or both :)

[absolutezero]

2001 for sure

[eonphi]

well...we'll see when it's released

[Unifaun]

that barcode is set very ugly!

[Squishy]

The fact is...if someone wanted to show this off why wouldnt they just take a picture of the whole case. Its either fake or someones dumb....or both :)

Because that someone is the Woolsworth company, as deducible from the link (http://www.woolworths.co.uk/ww_p2/product/index.jhtml?pid=50621667). Why would they add a fake back cover on their product page, when everything else is legit? They sure as hell don't care. I also think that it says '2001' on the back cover, but who knows?. It's really pixelish and typos on their records are not an unknown thing in Toolland either.

I have to repeat, I really love the glow around that barcode. It's just so fucking glowy.