I got an email back from Blair... [Archive]

dissonance19

03-11-2006, 02:15 PM

And if you want I'll forward the email to you if you don't believe me....

Subj: Re: Seriously, down-to-earth titles?
Date: 3/11/2006 5:12:17 PM Eastern Standard Time
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Sent from the Internet (Details)

the word was "gong" which was used on JAMBI. Read the newsletter
again. M is for Marie. Compare the titles to the hoaxed ones. ~ BMB
On Mar 11, 2006, at 11:06 AM, [email protected] wrote:

>
> What were you talking about? Those are not down to earth.
> I thought L.K was changed to something with an M? Unless, it's
> Wings for Marie and they made it into 2 songs. I also don't see a
> see 4 letter word that Danny was talking about for the gongs?
>
>
> - Joe
>
>
>
>

ATARI

03-11-2006, 02:18 PM

Has Blair emailed everybody on this forum but me or something?

gl0tch

03-11-2006, 02:21 PM

is that his entire response?
I wonder if he will say something about the album art?

lachrymoIogy

03-11-2006, 02:21 PM

blair emailed me naked pics of himself, want me to foreward them to you?

dissonance19

03-11-2006, 02:22 PM

Has Blair emailed everybody on this forum but me or something?

I 'm shocked he wrote me back. It's only 2nd time I ever have emailed him. Guess, it depends on what you ask.

TenSpeed

03-11-2006, 02:22 PM

I 'm shocked he wrote me back. It's only 2nd time I ever have emailed him. Guess, it depends on what you ask.
He's emailed me back before about the DVD singles (I've only sent him one email ever).

dissonance19

03-11-2006, 02:23 PM

is that his entire response?
I wonder if he will say something about the album art?

yeah, that's all he said. I'll forward it to you if you want see it that way.

dissonance19

03-11-2006, 02:24 PM

blair emailed me naked pics of himself, want me to foreward them to you?

no, that's ok. I'm sure they're for your eyes only.

STA

03-11-2006, 02:24 PM

And if you want I'll forward the email to you if you don't believe me....

Subj: Re: Seriously, down-to-earth titles?
Date: 3/11/2006 5:12:17 PM Eastern Standard Time
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Sent from the Internet (Details)

the word was "gong" which was used on JAMBI. Read the newsletter
again. M is for Marie. Compare the titles to the hoaxed ones. ~ BMB
On Mar 11, 2006, at 11:06 AM, [email protected] wrote:

>
> What were you talking about? Those are not down to earth.
> I thought L.K was changed to something with an M? Unless, it's
> Wings for Marie and they made it into 2 songs. I also don't see a
> see 4 letter word that Danny was talking about for the gongs?
>
>
> - Joe
>
>
>
>

I think the titles are very down-to-earth, especially, as Blair points out, when one compares them to the "hoaxed ones".

lachrymoIogy

03-11-2006, 02:25 PM

not necessary. theres not a lot of information in that email.

dissonance19

03-11-2006, 02:28 PM

I think the titles are very down-to-earth, especially, as Blair points out, when one compares them to the "hoaxed ones".

That's true. Some did seem normal but others seemed a little out there to me to be down-to-earth. Thought I'd ask him though.

dissonance19

03-11-2006, 02:30 PM

not necessary. theres not a lot of information in that email.

well, for one, L.K is not Lost Keys as people are thinking. It's Wings for Marie and that was split into 2 songs. I thought that was interesting. And the fact that he wrote back.

InertUniformity

03-11-2006, 02:41 PM

well, for one, L.K is not Lost Keys as people are thinking. It's Wings for Marie and that was split into 2 songs. I thought that was interesting. And the fact that he wrote back.

mmm...interesting. Were there 2 LKs? I doubt it. I believe BMB just inadvertently let the cat out of the bag.

dissonance19

03-11-2006, 03:15 PM

If your mail is true, which I believe untill proven otherwise, the tracklist gets more legit.

I'll forward it to you anyway?

But yeah, I was starting to think it's legit as well. Unless, he or they made a conscious effort to fit all the clues he put in from the newsletter.

Boozy Eulogist

03-11-2006, 03:18 PM

I once wrote him to inform him that Alex Grey and co did not have the massive backdrops from the tour after he had told a fan that the band did not have them and that he thought alex did.

No answrer, so I guess missing prized 40x30 prints are not that big of a deal.

Cid

03-11-2006, 03:20 PM

mmm...interesting. Were there 2 LKs? I doubt it. I believe BMB just inadvertently let the cat out of the bag.

yea, how likely is it that there were two LK's on the album and he used to always talk about LK. i don't believe that. so there was 2 LK's, then he says THE LK is changed? come on....if there was one LK, it's Lost Keys.

TurdEye13

03-11-2006, 03:56 PM

Here we go again. People are pissed because of lack of info and then whine when it does come out.

steve99_9

03-11-2006, 04:26 PM

Has Blair emailed everybody on this forum but me or something?
i emailed him twice, he replied once
i just jokingly ripped him for not giving us info on the Live DVD and CD a few months back and he replied telling me he has given us alot more info then we think and to go back and read the newletters alot more closly

it was neat

dissonance19

03-11-2006, 05:00 PM

Thought I'd take a shot and reply and he just sent this.

Subj: Re: Seriously, down-to-earth titles?
Date: 3/11/2006 7:58:15 PM Eastern Standard Time
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Sent from the Internet (Details)

It's actually much stranger than that - the whole lost keys thing, but you'll still get the lengthy song in all its glory. ~ BMB

On Mar 11, 2006, at 7:53 PM, [email protected] wrote:

So, then L.K was split into 2 songs then huh? Which sucks. I was actually looking forward to a 17 min song, damn. Or unless, you didn't mean L.K was the Daedalous piece in the newsletter? Lost Keys kinda throws me and probably everyone else off. Thanks for replying though.

- Joe

SpiralOutKeepGoing

03-11-2006, 05:46 PM

Thought I'd take a shot and reply and he just sent this.

Subj: Re: Seriously, down-to-earth titles?
Date: 3/11/2006 7:58:15 PM Eastern Standard Time
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Sent from the Internet (Details)

It's actually much stranger than that - the whole lost keys thing, but you'll still get the lengthy song in all its glory. ~ BMB

On Mar 11, 2006, at 7:53 PM, [email protected] wrote:

So, then L.K was split into 2 songs then huh? Which sucks. I was actually looking forward to a 17 min song, damn. Or unless, you didn't mean L.K was the Daedalous piece in the newsletter? Lost Keys kinda throws me and probably everyone else off. Thanks for replying though.

- Joe

What he didn't tell you was if you think Lost Keys is strange then wait til you hear the Pot.

KJM

03-11-2006, 06:13 PM

what? is he looking for your e-mails? he seems to be giving a lot of time to you

ATARI

03-11-2006, 06:13 PM

The Pot will blow your doors off

Paradigm619

03-11-2006, 06:22 PM

what? is he looking for your e-mails? he seems to be giving a lot of time to you

that's because they're butt buddies.

Foamy

03-11-2006, 07:03 PM

Now dont you all feel silly for claiming the track list was fake?

KJM

03-11-2006, 07:32 PM

I'd like those e-mails forwarded, I have a hard time believing you e-mailed him twice in one day and he got back to you both times

Systolic

03-11-2006, 07:34 PM

Teh Pot < Poopy Teh Clowwnz

tDoXoMl

03-11-2006, 08:02 PM

I once wrote him to inform him that Alex Grey and co did not have the massive backdrops from the tour after he had told a fan that the band did not have them and that he thought alex did.

No answrer, so I guess missing prized 40x30 prints are not that big of a deal.

id sell my penis for those