View Full Version : Better then the original?
BurntBridgeToll
07-12-2005, 11:55 AM
I think this version is much better than the original, even though I still like the original. Anyone else think the same way?
By the way, it shouldn't really count if you don't like the original inthe first place, because then you obviously like this version better if at all.
bluefire
07-12-2005, 12:01 PM
I know alot of fans on here say its better than the led zep version, but I dont know about that. The original is damn good. I love the dream like feel the original had. Since Led Zep wrote the song originally, i gonna have to give the nod to them, because it is much harder to write a good song originally, than it is to cover a song well. I will say that Tools version is very good, with probably my favorite maynard vocals on it.
Kelly
07-12-2005, 12:05 PM
I enjoy the Tool version to a large extent more than I do the Led Zeppelin versionk, of course bluefire is correct, you must give merit to Led for creating the song in the first, also I do not like how Tool ends the song with the screaming and drum solo. So for me all in all they even out.
Petary791
07-15-2005, 09:44 PM
I think the Zeppelin version is better in my opinion. This version is good and all, but it seems a little too drawn out for me.
metalwarriorx
07-18-2005, 07:47 PM
I like the tool version more. I prefer maynard over plants vocals. drums are better and so is bass. and i like the way the changed the song to make it their own.
ttimellapsec
07-18-2005, 08:37 PM
i used to like the tool one more, but now i'll have to go with zeppelin.
it just seems like zeppelin creates the atmosphere moreso than tool does, although tool's is still damn good, and their intermission is awesome
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.